The FY 2007 Pentagon Spending Request
by Christopher Hellman [contact information]
February 5, 2006
Top Line Funding - The Bush Administration is requesting $439.3 billion for the Department of Defense in Fiscal Year 2007, which begins on October 1, 2006. This is $28.5 billion more than the current level of $410.7 billion, an increase of 7 percent. This figure does not include funding for the nuclear weapons activities of the Department of Energy, which is considered part of total Defense Department spending. Nor does this figure include the costs of ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Office of Management and Budget estimates that total annual funding for the Defense Department alone will grow to $502.1 billion by Fiscal Year 2011. Total Pentagon spending, not including funding for the Department of Energy or for actual combat operations for the period FY07 through FY11 will exceed $2 trillion. Meanwhile, in January the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the deficit for FY06 will be $360 billion.
Funding for Contingency Operations (Supplemental Appropriations) - In addition to its annual budget request, the Pentagon also announced that it will shortly request $70 billion in supplemental funding for combat operations for Fiscal Year 2006, which is in addition to $50 billion in FY06 supplemental funding approved by Congress as part of their regular 2006 budget work. In addition, the request includes plans to seek a $50 billion bridge fund request to cover Iraq and Afghanistan operations during the first part of FY07. Congress has already approved over $300 billion in supplemental funding for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Missile Defense - The Administration is requesting $10.4 billion for missile defense in FY07, up roughly $1.7 billion from the current $8.7 billion. Missile defense continues to receive more funding than any other weapons program in the annual Pentagon budget. This total does not include $669 million for the SBIRS-High satellite program. The Airborne Laser program is transitioning from a deployment program to more of a technology demonstration program.
Shipbuilding - The request includes funding for the continued development of the Aircraft Carrier Replacement Program ($1.1 billion), the DD(x) Destroyer Program ($3.4 billion), and the Littoral Combat Ship ($840 million). It includes $2.6 billion for the purchase of one SSN-774 Virginia class nuclear attack submarine.
Aircraft - The request includes $2.7 billion for 30 of the Navys F/A-18E/F Super Hornet [although news reports indicate that an additional six aircraft are being funded through supplemental appropriations], $2.3 billion for procurement of 16 V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, and $5.3 billion for continued development of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and the procurement of the first five aircraft. The request also includes $2.8 billion for the F-22 Raptor fighter but includes no aircraft, but instead funds advanced procurement and RDT&E for a 60 aircraft multi-year procurement beginning in FY08.
Military Personnel - The request includes an increase in base pay of 2.2 percent. According to the Pentagon, base pay already has risen 25 percent since 2001. There are also targeted pay increases for specific skills, and $1.9 billion for recruiting and retention.
Homeland Defense - The request contains $16.7 billion for Pentagon activities related to homeland security including detection of and protection against weapons of mass destruction, emergency preparedness and response, and protecting critical infrastructure. NOTE: A footnote on the budgets Table Homeland Security Funding By Agency (Table S-5) indicates that DoDs contribution to homeland security has been revised upward significantly due to a change in methodology. Thus the budget shows a $16.4 billion DoD contribution to homeland security in FY06, rather than the $9.5 billion shown in last years request. The increase in DoDs contribution over last year is 1.6 percent.
Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) - The Administration is requesting $372.1 million for the CTR (also known as Nunn-Lugar) program, 10.4 percent below the current level of $415.5 million. Further, the request recommends a reduction (or rescission) of $4.5 million in current funding. The CTR program assists Russia and the former Soviet republics safeguard weapons of mass destruction and related technologies.
THE FY'07 PENTAGON "TOP LINE" REQUEST
The Bush Administration has requested the following funding for the military.
| FY’06 | FY’07 | FY’08 | FY’09 | FY’10 | FY’11 | TOTAL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOD Military(051) | 410.8 | 439.3 | 435.2 | 447.9 | 461.1 | 474.8 | 2,258.3 |
| DOE and Other | 23.7 | 23.4 | 23.9 | 24.3 | 28.8 | 25.3 | 125.7 |
| TOTAL (050) | 434.5 | 462.7 | 460.9 | 474.7 | 487.9 | 502.1 | 2,388.3 |
TABLE NOTES SOURCES: Department of Defense, Office of Management and Budgetís "Analytical Perspectives," Current Services Budget Authority by Function, Category and Program [Table 25-12].) |
|||||||
| FY’06 | FY’07 Requested |
+/- | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military Personnel | 106.8 | 110.8 | 4 | 3.7% |
| Operations & Maintenance | 142.6 | 152 | 9.4 | 6.6% |
| Procurement | 76.2 | 84.2 | 8 | 10.5% |
| RDT&E | 71 | 73.2 | 2.2 | 3.1% |
| Military Construction | 8 | 12.6 | 4.6 | 57.5% |
| Family Housing | 4 | 4.1 | 0.1 | 2.5% |
| Working Capital Funds | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 9.1% |
| TOTAL (051) | 410.8 | 439.3 | 28.5 | 6.9% |
TABLE NOTES |
||||
FY’07 |
Percentage of Total |
|
|---|---|---|
| Military Personnel | 110.8 | 25.2% |
| Operations & Maintenance | 152 | 34.6% |
| Procurement | 84.2 | 19.2% |
| RDT&E | 73.2 | 16.7% |
| Military Construction | 12.6 | 2.9% |
| Family Housing | 4.1 | 0.9% |
| Working Capital Funds | 2.4 | 0.5% |
| TOTAL (051) | 439.3 | |
TABLE NOTES |
||
| FY’06 | FY’07 Requested |
+/- | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army | 99.1 | 111.8 | 12.7 | 12.8% |
| Navy/Marine Corps | 122.5 | 127.4 | 4.9 | 4.0% |
| Air Force | 124.1 | 130.4 | 6.3 | 5.1% |
| Defense Wide | 65.1 | 69.7 | 4.6 | 7.1% |
| TOTAL (051) | 410.8 | 439.3 | 28.5 | 6.9% |
TABLE NOTES |
||||
FY’07 |
Percentage of Total |
|
|---|---|---|
| Army | 111.8 | 25.4% |
| Navy/Marine Corps | 127.4 | 29.0% |
| Air Force | 130.4 | 29.7% |
| Defense Wide | 69.7 | 15.9% |
| TOTAL (051) | 439.3 | |
TABLE NOTES SOURCES: DoD, Fiscal Year 2006 Budget Request, February 2006. |
||
THE FY'07 REQUEST FOR SELECTED WEAPONS SYSTEMS
The breakdown by selected weapon systems provides funding requests, per unit costs and total program costs for the Pentagon's major weapons programs.
| FY’07 Request | Quantity | Per Unit Cost | Total Program Cost |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F/A-18E/F Fighter | 2,732.40 | 30 | 95.2 | 43,982.9 |
| F-22 Fighter | 2,781.70 | —— | 338.8 | 61,323.7 |
| F-35 Fighter (JSF) | 5,290.10 | 5 | 104.4 | 256,617.6 |
| C-17 Transport Aircraft | 3,061.40 | 12 | 328.9 | 59,208.2 |
| C-130J Cargo Aircraft | 1,631.70 | 13 | 117.4 | 6,223.2 |
| B-2 Bomber | 415.5 | —— | 2,114 | 44,40 |
| V-22 Osprey Aircraft | 2,291.50 | 16 | 110.2 | 50,486.1 |
| E/A-18G Jamming Aircraft | 1,277.60 | 12 | 96.2 | 8,659.5 |
| MH-60R “Seahawk” Helicopter | 935.1 | 25 | 44 | 11,187.7 |
| MH-60S “Knighthawk” Helicopter | 628.9 | 18 | 28.5 | 7,720.6 |
| Aircraft Carrier Replacement Program (CVN-21) | 1,093.10 | —— | 12,004.40 | 36,013.2 |
| DDG-51 Destroyer | 355.8 | —— | 1,012.20 | 62,759.0 |
| DDG-1000 (DDx) Surface Combatant | 3,361.40 | 2 | 8,060.8* | |
| Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) | 840.4 | 2 | 656.9 | 1,313.7* |
| SSN-774 “Virginia” Attack Submarine | 2,621.70 | 1 | 3,132.70 | 93,979.8 |
| LPD-17 “San Antonio” Landing Ship | 297.5 | —— | 1,347.50 | 12,127.7 |
| LHA Replacement Vessel [LH/LHA®] | 1,170.40 | 1 | N/A | N/A |
| Trident II D-5 Missile | 1,081.70 | —— | 65.9 | 36,981.8 |
| Tactical Tomahawk Cruise Missile | 373.1 | 350 | 1.24 | 4,210.1 |
| Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) | 274.5 | 10,661 | 0.026 | 5,477.9 |
| Joint Stand-off Weapon (JSOW) | 153 | 397 | 0.46 | 4,778.6 |
| Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) | 228.1 | 234 | 0.93 | 4,643.4 |
| Small Diameter Bomb | 213.1 | 1,343 | 0.075 | 1,809.2 |
| Stryker Interim Armored Vehicle (IAV) | 809.2 | 100 | 4.2 | 10,405.5 |
| Future Combat System (FCS) | 3,745.60 | —— | N/A | 161,420.0 |
| Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) | 697 | 3,988 | 0.22 | 18,053.3 |
| Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (AAAV) | 444.5 | 15 | 12.3 | 12,579.0 |
| HMMWV “Humvee” Vehicles | 582.6 | 3,091 | N/A | N/A |
TABLE NOTES SOURCES: DoD, Program Acquisition Costs By Weapon System, Procurement Programs (P-1),and RDT&E Programs (R-1),February, 2006. "Per Unit Costs" and "Total Program Costs" are based on DoD's Selected Acquistion Report, November 15, 2005, with the exception of the B-2 Bomber, which is no longer listed. . "Per Unit Costs" are derived by dividing total program costs by the number of systems purchased, and include both procurement and research & development funding. |
||||
The FY'07 Request for Ballistic Missile Defense
February 6, 2006 The ballistic missile defense program receives more funding than any other weapons system in the annual Pentagon budget. Background: As part of its Fiscal Year 2002 budget request, the Defense Department announced a major restructuring of the Ballistic Missile Defense Office (BMDO). Funding for a range of programs within BMDO were absorbed and redistributed in to five major areas of research. These are the Terminal, Midcourse and Boost Segments, the Ballistic Missile Defense Segment, and Ballistic Missile Defense Sensors. As part of the FY'02 reorganization, some specific missile defense programs were absorbed in to the general research areas and have, from a funding prospective, effectively disappeared. Such changes continue in the FY'07 request. The BMD System Segment and the Terminal Segment have disappeared. Meanwhile, a half-dozen subsections under "BMD" have appeared. "Navy Area-Wide" was terminated in January, 2001, when it violated the Nunn-McCurdy amendment, which calls for the cancellation of a program that experiences significant cost growth. The Space Based Infra-Red System-High (SBIRS-High) continues to be funded outside the MDA budget.
FY’06 |
FY’07 Request |
|
|---|---|---|
| Terminal Defense (MDA) | 1,139.8 | 1,038.3 |
| Boost Defense (MDA) | 471.7 | 631.6 |
| Midcourse Defense (MDA) | 2,442.2 | 2,877.0 |
| AEGIS BMD (MDA) | 915.7 | 1,031.9 |
| BMD Sensors (MDA) | 278.2 | 514.5 |
| Space Tracking & Surveillance (MDA) | 231.5 | 390.6 |
| BMD Technologies (MDA) | 149.3 | 206.7 |
| Advanced Concepts (MDA) | 274.9 | 374.5 |
| BMD System Interceptors (MDA) | 209.3 | 405.5 |
| BMD Test & Targets (MDA) | 608.7 | 591.9 |
| Other Programs (MDA) | 960.7 | 1,247.9 |
| Joint Theater Air Missile Defense Org. (Joint Staff) | 80.7 | 54.6 |
| Military Construction | —— | —— |
| O&S (Army, Navy & Air Force) | 111.7 | 137.7 |
| MEADS/Patriot (Army) | 305 | 340.1 |
| Patriot PAC-3 & Patriot MODs (Army) | 559.7 | 559 |
| Total Ballistic Missile Defense | 8,739.1 | 10,401.8 |
| Space Based Infra-Red System-High (SBIRS-High) (Air Force) | 696.6 | 668.9 |
| GRAND TOTAL Ballistic Missile Defense | 9,435.7 | 11,070.7 |
|
||
The FY'07 REQUEST FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAVs)
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) continue to prove their worth on the modern battlefield. The newest weapon in the U.S.
arsenal is the armed UAV. The administration is
requesting over $1.7 billion to develop both combat and surveillance UAVs.
In all, the Pentagon plans to spend $11.6 billion from FY'07 through FY'11 to procure 322 UAVs. The Pentagon projects that this will increase the missions available to combat commanders from 12 to 21 (75 percent).
FY’07 |
Number | FY’08 Total |
Number | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Hawk (Air Force) | 687.3 | 5 | 752.2 | 6 | |
|
217.9 | 9 | 348.9 | 26 | |
| Shadow (Army) | 186.6 | 11 | 48.9 | —— | |
| Small UAV (Army) | 19.8 | 100 | 10.2 | 20 | |
| Fire Scout (Navy) | 94.2 | —— | 142.7 | 4 | |
| Extended Range (Army) | 134.1 | —— | 118.2 | —— | |
| J-UCAS (Navy) | —— | —— | 239.2 | —— | |
| J-UCAS (Air Force) | 305 | —— | —— | —— | |
| Broad Area Maritime (Navy) | —— | —— | 26.4 | —— | |
| TOTALS | 1,644.90 | 1,686.70 | |||
SOURCES: DoD’s Program Acquisiton Costs By Weapon System, February 2007. |
|||||
FY'07 DISCRETIONARY SPENDING REQUEST
The Fiscal Year 2007 budget request includes $873 billion for discretionary spending (the money the President and Congress must decide and act to spend each year), roughly $460 billion of which will go to the Pentagon. The "National Defense" category of the federal budget for FY'07 accounts for over half of all discretionary spending (53 percent). [NOTE: These totals do NOT include funding for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.]
The other category of federal spending is mandatory spending, money that is spent in compliance with existing laws that govern the particular program or function. Mandatory spending includes entitlements, money or benefits provided directly to individuals such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps, and Federal Retirement. It also includes interest payments on the national debt.
| Spending Category | Billions of US dollars | |
|---|---|---|
| Defense | 460 | |
| Education | 56.8 | |
| Health | 53.1 | |
| Justice | 39.7 | |
| Veternan Benefits | 35.8 | |
| International Affairs | 35.1 | |
| Housing Assitance | 31.5 | |
| Natural Resources & Environment | 27.9 | |
| Science & Space | 26.1 | |
| Transportation | 22.8 | |
| Training, Employment & Social Services | 18 | |
| General Government | 17.1 | |
| Other Income Security | 16.3 | |
| Economic Development | 11.7 | |
| Social Security & Medicare | 9.8 | |
| Agriculture | 5.6 | |
| Energy | 3.8 | |
| Notes: The “Social Security & Medicare” funding in this graph refers to administrative costs associated with these programs, and does not reflect actual benefits paid out. | ||
Christopher Hellman 202-546-0795 chellman@armscontrolcenter.org
Christopher Hellman is the Military Policy Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation where his work focuses on national security spending, military planning and policy, trends in the defense industry, global military spending, and homeland security. Hellman is a frequent media commentator on these issues. Previously, Hellman worked for the Center for Defense Information, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and spent ten years as a congressional staffer working on national security and foreign policy issues.