• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • 25 Years Since September 11
    • Fact Sheets
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Countries
    • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
    • No First Use
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Nuclear Testing
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Missile Defense
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / Middle East Monitor Story on Missile Defense Quotes Phil Coyle

July 31, 2014

Middle East Monitor Story on Missile Defense Quotes Phil Coyle

It is a lie to say that Iron Dome is protecting Israelis from Hamas

July 31, 2014

by Alastair Sloan

A sceptical Philip E Coyle III shook his head at the Israel Defence Forces claim that its “Iron Dome” missile defence system intercepts nine out of ten Hamas rockets. “No military system is ninety per cent effective,” he said.

Coyle is amongst a worrying number of Israeli and American defence experts disputing the efficacy of a programme that has so far cost American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. Thanks to a recent hike in funding from the US Congress, it is set to receive hundreds of millions more.

The sceptic isn’t alone. Theodore Postol, a physicist and missile-defence expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, estimates that the interception rate of the Iron Dome system is just five per cent, or ten on a lucky day. His research was assisted by Dr Mordechai Shefer, who worked previously for Rafael, the system’s manufacturer.

We should listen because Postol and friends have form in disputing defence statistics: while the United States government was claiming that Patriot missiles had a near one hundred per cent accuracy rate during the first Gulf War, these scientists were debunking the sales patter to Congress. At the end of the research, Postol concluded that the US missile system had enjoyed an accuracy rate of… zero. The embarrassing statistic is now accepted widely in the defence community.

Read the full story here

Posted in: Center in the News, Press Room

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • You can destroy a facility. What about knowledge? October 20, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The True Costs of War – Moderated Question and Answer Session October 16, 2026
  • The True Costs of War: Iran Following the Pattern October 9, 2026
  • Introducing: Neighbors Against Nukes October 1, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The Costs of False Security – Live Audience Question & Answer Session September 30, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • 25 Years Since September 11
  • Fact Sheets
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Countries
  • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
  • No First Use
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Nuclear Testing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Missile Defense

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency