• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Asia / Senior Science Fellow Philip Coyle Quoted in Foreign Policy

May 31, 2017

Senior Science Fellow Philip Coyle Quoted in Foreign Policy

Read the full piece here. 

“Based on its testing record, we cannot rely upon this missile defense program to protect the United States from a North Korean long-range missile,” said Philip E. Coyle of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. “In several ways, this test was a $244 million dollar baby step, a baby step that took three years.”

The test ICBM flew slower than an actual ICBM from North Korea would travel, making it easier to track and hit, while the closure rate between the target and the interceptor also was slower than an intercept would be between a North Korean ICBM and a U.S. interceptor, Coyle said.

Read the full piece here. 

Posted in: Asia, Center in the News, Missile Defense, North Korea, Press & In the News on Missile Defense, Press & In the News on North Korea, Press Room

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Statement on President Trump’s latest attack on Iran  February 28, 2026
  • With Doomsday Approaching, Is It Time for a New Start? February 5, 2026
  • Statement On the Expiration of the Last Treaty Restricting the World’s Two Largest Nuclear Arsenals (New START) February 4, 2026
  • The world’s last nuclear safeguard expires TODAY. No backup plan is in place… and experts have a dire warning for humanity February 4, 2026
  • Canada has no nuclear weapons. After Trump’s Greenland threats, should it? February 4, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency