• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • 25 Years Since September 11
    • Fact Sheets
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Countries
    • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
    • No First Use
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Nuclear Testing
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Missile Defense
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / (Translation) As in less than a year threat of nuclear war has turned into a promise of peace between Koreas

April 28, 2018

(Translation) As in less than a year threat of nuclear war has turned into a promise of peace between Koreas

Executive Director John Tierney spoke to BBC Brazil about his concerns about the process of achieving peace on the Korean peninsula.

The possibility of an apocalyptic scenario came not only from the general public, but from experts such as John Tierney, a former US Congressman for the Democratic Party and current executive director of the Center for Arms Control and Nonproliferation, an organization based in Washington that monitors the arms race and nuclear world.

The concern, Tierney tells BBC Brazil, was with the potential of a careless or harder gesture on the part of Trump that would make Kim Jong-un understand that his regime was under imminent threat of attack. According to him, there was also the chance of some unthinking reaction from the American leader to the provocations of Pyongyang. “In any of these scenarios, there seemed to be a real risk that either side would initiate military action that, even limited, would escalate.”

…

“There is no confirmation that they have a miniaturized warhead or a fully functional ICBM (Ballistic Missile),” Tierney notes. But even if it’s just more propaganda, the idea seems to have been absorbed by the North Korean establishment, giving Kim some time to focus on economic expansion.

…

“Perhaps a positive thing, if a (Korea) agreement is reached, it may be that in this divided nation a peace agreement will have wider acceptance, constraining the far right as it did during Nixon’s visit to China,” Tierney evaluates. Read more (link in Portuguese; text here is translated)

Posted in: Center in the News, North Korea, Press & In the News on North Korea, Press Room

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • You can destroy a facility. What about knowledge? October 20, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The True Costs of War – Moderated Question and Answer Session October 16, 2026
  • The True Costs of War: Iran Following the Pattern October 9, 2026
  • Introducing: Neighbors Against Nukes October 1, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The Costs of False Security – Live Audience Question & Answer Session September 30, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • 25 Years Since September 11
  • Fact Sheets
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Countries
  • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
  • No First Use
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Nuclear Testing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Missile Defense

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency