• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Iran Diplomacy / Bolton Advocates an Israeli Strike on Iran

August 24, 2012

Bolton Advocates an Israeli Strike on Iran

John Bolton, one of Mitt Romney’s top foreign policy advisors, wrote another op-ed about Iran this week. In the past, Bolton has advocated U.S. military action to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, but has done so while shying away from the potential consequences. This time, however, he makes no policy recommendations for the United States. Instead, he implicitly advocates an Israeli strike on Iran while making a number of concerning statements along the way.

Bolton starts out by advising Israel to ignore President Obama’s statements on Iran, saying his commitment to stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons isn’t believable. It is one thing to debate Obama’s intentions vis-à-vis Iran as part of a domestic debate, but explicitly telling a foreign country to ignore the official position of the United States weakens our credibility.

Next, Bolton said Israeli President Shimon Peres sounded “surprisingly like an Obama surrogate” for expressing his opinion that Israel shouldn’t strike Iran unilaterally. Perhaps Peres’ statement is inconvenient for Bolton, but the president of a robust democracy expressing his views on one of the most intensely debated issues facing Israel today isn’t acting as an Obama surrogate, he’s participating in public discourse.

He ends his article by saying “The hard reality, therefore, is that Israel must make its own military decision, preferably one based on physics, not politics. Israel most likely still has time if it wishes to act independently, but there is no guarantee how long.”

This can only be read as an endorsement of an Israeli strike. It is clear that Bolton believes a military strike would be an effective way of halting Iran’s nuclear program (though much evidence exists to the contrary) but doesn’t believe Obama will follow through with his commitment to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. So if the United States won’t use military force, he believes Israel should, even though he admits that an Israeli strike would “strain its capacity to the outer limits, [pose] substantial risks of heavy losses in the initial attack, and [raise] grave fears of Iranian retaliation, either directly or more likely through Hezbollah and Hamas.”

In essence, Bolton is advocating that a foreign country act against the wishes of the United States with little regard for the consequences such action would have on either the United States or Israel. The political opposition using foreign countries to circumvent the current administration is not a healthy precedent to set for U.S. foreign policy.

Posted in: Iran Diplomacy, Israel, Middle East, Nukes of Hazard blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Future of Arms Control: 2023 Annual Conference September 20, 2023
  • The Evolving Cyber-Based Threat: The Need for International Regulations to Avoid ‘Accidental’ Conflicts September 12, 2023
  • 전문가들 “김정은 방러, 전방위 군사 협력 현실화…중국 셈법 복잡” September 12, 2023
  • North Korea’s Kim Jong Un to meet with Vladimir Putin as Russia seeks closer military ties, more support for Ukraine war September 5, 2023
  • Biological threats have evolved for the worse, and we are not prepared September 1, 2023

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency