• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • 25 Years Since September 11
    • Fact Sheets
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Countries
    • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
    • No First Use
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Nuclear Testing
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Missile Defense
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Nukes of Hazard blog / Dr. Strangelove Or: How We Learned to Start Worrying and Hate the Bomb

January 29, 2018

Dr. Strangelove Or: How We Learned to Start Worrying and Hate the Bomb

Today marks the 54th anniversary of the release of Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, the Cold War-era classic often seen as the ultimate comedy on decidedly unfunny nuclear war.

The movie, starring Peter Sellers and George C. Scott, is the story of an insane general who sets the United States on a path to nuclear war as politicians and military officials frantically try to stop it.

Despite being a comedy, the movie is almost shockingly technically accurate. That’s because filmmaker Stanley Kubrick used Thomas Schelling as his technical advisor. Schelling, a Nobel Laureate in Economics, started his career at RAND, where he pioneered the concept of game theory that was used to inform nuclear strategy. Schelling, together with his ground-breaking methodology, was often seen as one who steadied nuclear tensions during the Cold War.

The movie, which was nominated for four Academy Awards, is a favorite among nuclear policy analysts in particular. Center staff members were deeply affected by the film, and continue to urge others — policy wonks and non-policy wonks alike — to watch it.

Senior Policy Analyst Sara Z. Kutchesfahani:

“When I was teaching a graduate course on nuclear history and security policy, a viewing of Dr. Strangelove was part of the syllabus because it’s the quintessential nuke film. It shows just how high the stakes are, and how easy it is to make mistakes and/or rely so much on misperception. In my mind, this film might have helped keep the Cold War cold.”

Senior Policy Director Alexandra Bell:

“I watched Dr. Strangelove for the first time when I was in undergrad at Chapel Hill. The movie is funny, in fact, a masterful piece of satire. It is definitely my favorite Kubrick film. Unfortunately, it is also too close to the truth for comfort. The world came dangerously close to destroying itself during the Cold War and looking back, you can hardly believe we were so foolish. The movie should be required viewing for everyone working on nuclear policy, with particular focus on the last scene — it really sticks with you.” 

Senior Fellow John Isaacs:

“Dr. Strangelove was probably one of the two most influential films ever made about the dangers of nuclear war. (The second one, The Day After.) The satire of real-life American nuclear warriors such as Wernher von Braun and Curtis LeMay, was a good means of getting Americans to think about the unthinkable — the huge nuclear inventory of the U.S. and Soviet Union that could easily destroy the world.”

Executive Director John Tierney:

“I was in my thirties when I saw Dr. Strangelove — it was the height of the Cold War. It was a great film, but I didn’t think much about it until President Trump took office. The statements he makes about nuclear weapons border on farce. Perhaps they should hold a screening at the White House.”  

Policy Analyst James McKeon:

“The one thing about Dr. Strangelove that stands out to me is that even decades after it was filmed, and nearly three decades since the end of the Cold War, the film still highlights some of the absurdities and dangers of the nuclear era that never went away.”

Posted in: Nukes of Hazard blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • You can destroy a facility. What about knowledge? October 20, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The True Costs of War – Moderated Question and Answer Session October 16, 2026
  • The True Costs of War: Iran Following the Pattern October 9, 2026
  • Introducing: Neighbors Against Nukes October 1, 2026
  • BONUS Episode: The Costs of False Security – Live Audience Question & Answer Session September 30, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • 25 Years Since September 11
  • Fact Sheets
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Countries
  • Pentagon and Weapons Spending
  • No First Use
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Nuclear Testing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Missile Defense

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency