• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Front and Center / Exchange of Day: Onerous Conditions on Reducing Non-Deployed Weapons Edition

November 10, 2011

Exchange of Day: Onerous Conditions on Reducing Non-Deployed Weapons Edition

REP. [MICHAEL] TURNER: The next issue goes to the issue of reducing without the hedge. You know, our provision [in the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act] is the chemistry military research facility in New Mexico, the uranium processing facility in Tennessee, that they need to be operational. President Obama’s national security adviser, Tom Donilon, said to the Carnegie Endowment earlier this year in fact if Congress approves the president’s funding program for the nuclear complex, it allows us to reduce the size of our nuclear stockpile because we’d be able to maintain a robust hedge against technical problems with a much smaller reserve force.

We had put in the legislation that these two facilities had to be operational. Obviously if they’re not operational, they’re not contributing to the hedge. Is it now the administration’s policy that they’re not necessary for further reductions in the hedge?

…

MR. [JIM] MILLER: Mr. Chairman, is a B-52 bomber that is no longer operational considered in this category?

…

MR. MILLER: So there’s a semantic question that we would need to clarify, and that is this is a relatively small issue, is whether the intent of the House is to have this applied to nuclear warheads only, or to delivery systems. Frankly, I’ve heard both of those explanations. That’s a relatively smaller issue. It’s important but I would hope that the intent was nuclear warhead. If that is the case then what it says is that given the timelines — if we have received full funding, the timelines for making CMRR and UPF operational, it means that there may be no retirement, dismantlement or elimination of non-deployed weapons until the mid-2020s.

Is that something that makes sense for the country? My guess is, my strong view actually, is that the answer is likely to be no. [emphasis mine.]

Exchange between Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH) Chairman of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee and Dr. James Miller, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, at a November 2 Subcommittee hearing on the current status and future direction for U.S. nuclear weapons policy and posture.  For more information on this and other nuclear policy-related limitations attached to the House version of the defense bill by Rep. Turner, see here.

We’ll also likely be commenting on other aspects of the November 2 hearing (in fact we already have here), which included all sorts of interests nuggets dear to the heart of NoH.

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Long Shadow of Syria’s Chemical Weapons May 15, 2025
  • Fact Sheet: Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT) May 15, 2025
  • How real is the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan? May 13, 2025
  • Deterrence can create space for diplomacy, not replace it.  May 12, 2025
  • Op-ed: How the India-Pakistan Crisis Puts U.S. Strategy to the Test May 7, 2025

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency