Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Asia / Fact Sheet: North Korea Nuclear Weapons Activity

June 23, 2017

Fact Sheet: North Korea Nuclear Weapons Activity

Number of nuclear weapons: Unverified, but recent estimates suggest that North Korea possesses enough fissile material for 10-16 nuclear weapons.

Nuclear Tests

    1. October 2006 – Claimed successful. Deemed unsuccessful.

    On October 16, 2006, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence confirmed “North Korea conducted an underground nuclear explosion in the vicinity of P’unggye on October 9, 2006. The explosion yield was less than a kiloton.” At such a low yield, the international community labeled the North’s test a failure.

    1. May 25, 2009 – Claimed successful. Deemed unsuccessful.

    On June 15, 2009, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence stated, “The U.S. Intelligence Community assesses that North Korea probably conducted an underground nuclear explosion in the vicinity of P’unggye on May 25, 2009. The explosion yield was approximately a few kilotons.” Official and unofficial reports vary on estimated yield but it is generally regarded as higher than its 2006 test, but still considered unsuccessful.

    1. February 12, 2013 – Claimed successful. Deemed successful.

    On February 12, 2013, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence stated that North Korea probably carried out an underground nuclear explosion with a yield of approximately several kilotons. Some experts speculate that the test involved uranium, rather than plutonium used in the last two tests, but there has been no official confirmation regarding which material was involved in the test. North Korea claimed that the device tested was a miniaturized warhead that could be mounted on a ballistic missile.

    1. January 6, 2016 – Claimed successful. Deemed successful, but not hydrogen explosion.

    On January 6, 2016, North Korea claimed to have detonated a miniaturized hydrogen bomb. Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear weapons, derive their extremely high yield from nuclear fusion, the process of combing light elements to make heavier ones.

    However, the international community has been unable to confirm the validity of the announcement. Based on the low seismic readings of the test, the bomb’s yield was not estimated to be high enough for a true thermonuclear weapon.

    1. September 9, 2016 – Claimed successful. Deemed successful.

    At 9:00am local time on September 9, 2016, the U.S. Geological Survey detected seismic activity consistent with nuclear test explosions. North Korea announced that it had successfully tested a miniaturized nuclear weapon, coinciding with the celebration of the anniversary of the founding of the DPRK. According to a Washington Post report, North Korean officials claim that the test represents significant advancement toward “smaller, lighter” warheads with “higher strike power.” The test was estimated to have a 10 to 20 kiloton yield, the largest North Korea has produced to date. In comparison, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan during World War II had a 15 kiloton yield.

    1. September 3, 2017 Claimed successful. Deemed successful.

    At noon local time on September 3, 2017, the U.S. Geological Survey recorded an earthquake of 6.3 magnitude near Sungjibaegam, North Korea. According to news reports, North Korea state media claimed that it had successfully tested a hydrogen bomb (H-bomb or thermonuclear weapon). The tremors caused by the explosion were nearly 10 times more powerful than those triggered by North Korea’s 5th nuclear test, indicating a yield of at least 100 kilotons, though the exact yield has not been finalized. This yield would be consistent with either a large fission weapon, or more likely either a boosted weapon or a thermonuclear weapon.

Sources: U.S. Director of National Intelligence, U.S. Geological Survey, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, Washington Post, Reuters, BBC, CNN, Nuclear Threat Initiative, New York Times.

Posted in: Asia, Factsheets on North Korea, North Korea

Newsletter

Sign up for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation's monthly newsletter to get a rundown of top stories delivered to your inbox each month.
Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Footballs, Biscuits, and America’s Nuclear Monarchy January 15, 2021
  • The Humanity Beneath the Bomb December 31, 2020
  • Brief Summary of Fiscal Year 2021 Defense and Energy and Water Appropriations Bills December 23, 2020
  • 2020 Mailbag Special Episode December 21, 2020
  • Front and Center: December 20, 2020 December 20, 2020
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2021 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency