• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Issue Center / Factsheet: FY 2016 Defense Nuclear Non-Proliferation Budget Request

February 2, 2015

Factsheet: FY 2016 Defense Nuclear Non-Proliferation Budget Request

Greg Terryn and Sarah Tully

Since 2004, the NNSA’s nuclear non-proliferation programs have facilitated the removal of all weapons-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) from 17 countries—165 bombs worth of nuclear material. Nevertheless, “nearly 2,000 metric tons of weapons-usable nuclear materials remain spread across hundreds of sites around the globe,” according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, some of it poorly secured and at risk of theft. So how did these critical programs fare in the president’s Feb. 2 budget request?

The Administration has asked for $12.6 billion for the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) as part of its FY 2016 Department of Energy budget request. $1.9 billion of that request will go towards Defense Nuclear Non-Proliferation (DNN) programs tasked with preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and materials.

While the $1.9 billion request represents a $299 million increase from the previous year, that number is still down significantly from just a few years ago. Additionally, the FY16 request includes $234 million for “Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response” in the DNN budget. This program was transferred into DNN this year from Weapons Activities, a separate NNSA line item. Therefore, funding for Nuclear Counterterrorism represents a nominal increase in DNN funding, but not a substantive increase in nuclear non-proliferation capabilities. Moreover, a portion of the DNN budget has been requested for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, which has been criticized as a funding sinkhole.

1 Excludes $438 million for MOX
2 Excludes $446.5 million for MOX
3 Excludes $345 million for MOX
4 Excludes $345 million for MOX and $234 million for Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response

Last Updated: February 2015

Posted in: Issue Center

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Axios Future of Defense July 16, 2025
  • We should observe July 16 but celebrate July 17 July 16, 2025
  • The Korean Peninsula Has Seen Grand Overtures Come and Go – What Matters Now is Whether Small Steps Can Still Lead Somewhere July 9, 2025
  • Israeli nuclear weapons at the heart of a strategic taboo July 4, 2025
  • Fiscal Year 2026 Defense Budget Request Briefing Book July 3, 2025

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency