Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Missile Defense / Major Differences Between House and Senate Fiscal Year 2017 Defense Authorization Bills

September 12, 2016

Major Differences Between House and Senate Fiscal Year 2017 Defense Authorization Bills

Click here for a PDF version.

 

Additional Resources:

Senate Report on NDAA

House Report on NDAA

 

FUNDING, TROOP LEVELS AND POLICY ISSUES

House: Uses $18 billion in the OCO account to pay for base budget items, which will require a new request for war funds by the end of April 2017

Senate: Does not have a similar provision, though a Sen. McCain amendment to add nearly $18 billion missed cloture by a vote of 56-42

 

Troop Levels

House: Increases troop strength of active and reserve forces:

Active: 20,000+ Army, 1,715+ Navy, 3,000+ Marine Corps, 4,000+ Air Force (Sec. 401)

Reserve: 15,000+ Army National Guard, 10,000+ Army Reserve (Sec. 411)

Senate: The Senate adopts the Department of Defense’s requests for troop strength

 

Women & Selective Service

House: Does not have a similar provision (Though a provision to require women to register for selective service was removed on the House Floor after narrowly passing in HASC)

Senate: Requires women to register under the Selective Service Act (Sec. 591)

 

Pay Raise for Armed Services in Fiscal Year 2017

House: 2.1% (HASC Rept)

Senate: 1.6% (SASC Summary)

 

National Security Council Staff Size

House: Requires Senate confirmation of the National Security Adviser if the NSC staff exceeds 100 employees. (Sec. 926)

Senate: Limits the staff of the NSC to 150 people (Sec. 1089)

 

Organizational Changes

House: Does not have a similar provision

Senate: Eliminates the joint program office for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (Sec. 1086)

 

House: Does not have a similar provision

Senate: Eliminates position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (Sec. 901)

 

House: Reduces the number of generals and admirals on active duty by five. (Sec. 910)

Senate: Reduces the number of four star generals from 41 to 27 and reduces the overall number of general and flag officers by 25 percent. (Sec. 501)

 

 

Auditing the Pentagon

House: Requires a report ranking all military departments and Defense Agencies on their ability to be audited as required by law. (Sec.1003)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

Afghanistan Visa Waivers

House: Provides special immigrant visas for Afghans who helped the U.S. government perform missions in Afghanistan and whose lives may now be in danger (Sec. 1216)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision.

 

Guantanamo Bay prison

House: Continues to bar closing the Guantanamo Bay prison and transferring detainees to the United States (Sec 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1099 )

Senate: Continues to bar closing the Guantanamo Bay prison but permits the Pentagon to plan and design a facility in the United States that could house detainees. (Sec. 1023, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1099)

 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS, NON-PROLIFERATION, MISSILE DEFENSE AND ARMS CONTROL ISSUES

 

B-21 Strategic Bomber

House: Requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress the cost of the full B-21 program. (Sec. 136)

Senate: Requires the Air Force release a baseline developmental contract estimate of the initial contract for the system. (Sec. 217)

If the B-21 bomber fleet cost grows by 25 percent or more, the Pentagon “shall immediately halt the program” (Sec. 844)

 

Alert Status of Land-based Nuclear Missiles

House: Prevents changes to the alert status of America’s ground-based nuclear missiles and bars a unilateral reduction in their numbers. (Sec. 1649A)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

National Missile defense

House: Calls for a robust layered missile defense system and repeals the 1999 bill that permitted the U.S. to build a missile defense system against “limited ballistic missile attack” (Sec. 1665)

Senate: Eliminates the 17-year old restriction for a “limited” missile defense program in order to permit work on an expanded missile defense, potentially against Russian and Chinese missiles. (Sec. 1665)

 

Space-based interceptors

House: “Requires the initiation of concept definition, design, research, development, and engineering evaluation and testing for a space-based intercept and defeat layer and space test bed.”  (Sec. 1656)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

Nuclear Weapon Dismantlement

House: Limits to $56 million annually the use of funds to dismantle nuclear weapons from FY2017-2021 and prevents funding from FY2017-2021 to be used to accelerate dismantlement (Sec. 3118)

Senate: Prevents funding from FY2017-2021 to be used to accelerate dismantlement beyond what is already planned by the Department of Energy (Sec. 3113)

 

 

Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium (Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication)

House: Requires the Department of Energy to move forward with the construction and project support activities for the Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina. Provision also includes a waiver authority for the Secretary of Energy (Sec. 3113)

Senate: Requires an assessment of the technical and managerial risks of the program and recommendations for improvement. (Sec. 3114), Added $70 million for to continue construction of MOX. (Report Language)

 

Cooperative Threat Reduction funds in China

House: Limits Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) funds in China unless China has disrupted the proliferation activities of Li Fangwei and arrested him and has not proliferated to any non-nuclear weapons state. (Sec. 1303)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

Nuclear Security Cooperation with Russia

House: Restricts nuclear security cooperation with Russia. (Sec. 3115)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision.

 

Reduction to Non-Proliferation Account:

House: Cuts $82.4 million from the “Material Management & Minimization” and “Non-Proliferation R&D” accounts within the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Defense Nuclear Non-Proliferation program, with the funds added to the Surface-To-Air missile MSE program. (Rep. Westerman (R-AR) amendment)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

Nuclear Report Mandate

House: Fences off 50% of the funds for the Office of the Secretary of the Energy until the finished report “U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the Coming Decades” is sent to the Intelligence Committees in both chambers. (Sec. 3116)

Senate: Does not have a similar provision

 

Open Skies Treaty

House: Restricts the expenditure of funds towards implementation of the Open Skies Treaty (Sec. 1231) and an assessment of whether or not the Open Skies Treaty is in the interest of the United States. (Sec. 1259)

Senate: Requires an annual report on observational flights over the United States under the Open Skies Treaty (Sec. 1079)

 

CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS

 

Littoral Combat Ship

House: Increases purchase of Littoral Combat Ships from two to three (HSAC Rept)

Senate: Preserves the President’s request of two Littoral Combat Ships (Sec 122)

 

Joint Aerostat “Runaway Blimp” Program (JLENS):

House: Reduction of $43 million, leaving $2.4 million to conclude the program. (Sec. 4201, Pg. 1339)

Senate: Reduction of $41 million, leaving $4.5 million to conclude the program. (Sec. 4201, Pg. 1467)

Posted in: Factsheets & Analysis on Nuclear Weapons, Factsheets on Non-Proliferation, Missile Defense, Non-Proliferation, Nuclear Weapons, Security Spending, United States

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Growing number of high-security pathogen labs around world raises concerns March 17, 2023
  • Global Biosafety Fears Grow Amid Rise in Labs Handling Dangerous Pathogens March 17, 2023
  • Evolving Threats, Un-evolving Solutions: Geo-Politicization of Export Control Policy March 17, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: The Australia Group March 16, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones March 14, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency