• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Missile Defense / On Iran’s “New” Missile Tests: Keep Calm and Carry On

July 10, 2012

On Iran’s “New” Missile Tests: Keep Calm and Carry On

An Associated Press report about Iran’s July 3 missile tests, which has been printed in several sources, takes the Iranian government’s assertions about the range of these missiles at face value–a common mistake, despite Tehran’s clear interest in exaggerating its capabilities.

The story calls the tests “long-range,” although even the Iranian government said it “launched missiles from 300 to 1,300 kilometers [200 to 800 miles],” which is much shorter than what the U.S. government considers long-range (over 5,500 kilometers/3,500 miles).

Further, estimates of a missile’s range often assume only the weight of the missile itself, even though loading a heavy warhead would decrease the distance it can travel.

A report released by the East-West Institute in 2010 found that Iran would have a much harder time increasing the range of its missiles in the future:

 

Iran’s efforts to increase the range and payload of its ballistic missiles […] followed a strategy of gradually increasing the length of the fuel and oxidizer tanks of the original Nodong so that it can carry more propellant […] Further advances in Iran’s ability to produce rockets of greater range and payload will require new and major technological advances beyond those it has so far demonstrated.

 

Trusting Tehran’s assertions contributes to the false narrative that the threat from Iran is exploding and requires “decisive” action (setting aside for a moment the fact that no one can point to a decisive action that is likely to be successful, including a military strike). The bigger picture, which accounts for technological and other hurdles to Iran developing a deliverable nuclear weapon, shows that the United States and our allies have time for persistence and patience.

Posted in: Missile Defense, Nukes of Hazard blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • How real is the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan? May 13, 2025
  • Deterrence can create space for diplomacy, not replace it.  May 12, 2025
  • Op-ed: How the India-Pakistan Crisis Puts U.S. Strategy to the Test May 7, 2025
  • Shawn Rostker: ‘Quiet diplomacy is likely happening, even if the public posture is more restrained’ May 7, 2025
  • India’s Nuclear Weapons: How Far Can Missiles Travel? April 30, 2025

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency