NATO Nuclear Drawdown Now Seems Unlikely By Ralph Vartabedian and W.J. Hennigan September 19, 2014 Over the last 15 years, this U.S. nuclear umbrella has extended over an additional dozen Eastern European nations that gained entry into NATO. As the Ukrainian crisis has unfolded, Obama has asserted that the alliance needs to “make concrete commitments […]
Kendall: Money doesn’t grow on trees, even at the Pentagon
The Pentagon is making the case for an overhaul of its fleet, and according to Undersecretary of Defense Frank Kendall, the nuclear enterprise is at the front of the line. That is, if they can just figure out how to pay for it.
At the Air Force Association’s annual conference this week, Kendall delivered remarks that had been prepared by the Secretary of Defense, who had been pulled away at the last minute. The speech referred to the nuclear enterprise as, “the very foundation of U.S. national security.”
Driving the point home, Kendall repeated twice, “No capability we maintain is more important than our nuclear deterrent.”
Of course, Kendall and Hagel have reason to want to reassure the Air Force that nukes are a top priority, but Kendall’s speech leaves little room for interpretation.
Know that what you do every day is foundational to America’s national security and the top priority of the Department of Defense – the top priority of the Department of Defense.
Secretary Hagel wants you and our entire military to know that comes from him personally.
But paying for those upgrades will take more than reassurance. And there’s the rub. The Pentagon simply does not have enough resources to pay for its entire wish list of upgrades, both nuclear and conventional. And, perhaps surprisingly, Kendall acknowledges that fact, telling reporters that:
There’s been some conversation about that, but at the end of the day we have to find money to pay for these things one way or another, right? So changing the accounting system doesn’t really change that fundamental requirement. We still need the money and it has to come from somewhere.
Kendall’s bout of honesty comes on the heels of some speculation that world events might allow for some wiggle room in the DOD’s budget – or at least OCO. But the acknowledgement of the budget challenges to come is significant nonetheless.
At a time when the Air Force is in need of a multitude of updates more relevant to the current threat environment, the issue is likely much greater than Kendall lets on. The true cost of focusing myopically on the nuclear enterprise is that it will leave other programs to starve in its wake.
Fact Sheet: Government, Former Government Officials Agree: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Spending Plans Enormously Costly
A collection of quotes from U.S. military leaders and nuclear laboratory officials on the costs of nuclear weapons.
Letter to Chairman Royce and Ranking Member Engel on Iran’s Nuclear History
Laicie Heeley, Director of Middle East and Defense Policy at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, signed onto a letter critiquing efforts by Chairman Ed Royce and Ranking Member Elliot Engel to thwart a nuclear deal with Iran on the basis of the possible military dimensions (PMD) of its nuclear history. Sep 18, 2014 […]
Letter to the Department of Energy Regarding Termination of Dr. James Doyle
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation and Council for a Livable World signed onto a letter censuring the Department of Energy for improper handling of the termination of Dr. James Doyle, a former employee of the Los Alamos National Laboratory who spoke out against nuclear deterrence. Sep 18, 2014 The Honorable Ernest Moniz Secretary […]