• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Front and Center / Quote of the Day: Blasphemy on the SSBN(X) from an Unlikely Source edition

November 29, 2011

Quote of the Day: Blasphemy on the SSBN(X) from an Unlikely Source edition

“The submarine-based deterrent is considered advanced and strong, the most survivable when we are attacked,” [Frank] Hoffman, [who until June 2011 was a senior Navy capabilities and readiness executive and now is at the National Defense University] says. “But since its purpose is to deter attacks, it is most survivable when it’s failed. It has huge investment costs.”

“The replacement being developed for the Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine is expected to cost between $6 billion and $8 billion per copy, with the first purchased in the latter part of this decade. Hoffman warns that when the Navy, which now spends about $14 billion to $15 billion annually on shipbuilding, starts buying one ballistic-missile submarine a year, it will consume half of that budget over the ensuing 12 years.

““The rest of the Navy is going to shrink and erode, so you are not as present, you’re going to be late, you are going to respond later,” Hoffman says. “So the nation needs to decide where it needs to place its strategic-deterrent investment.” Hoffman suggests that the land-based and air-based deterrent would be sufficient, noting that nations such as China are already pursuing a “minimalist” deterrent capability.

“Within the military establishment, Hoffman’s argument is tantamount to blasphemy.” [emphasis mine]

Excerpted from Frank Oliveri’s excellent November 21, 2011, Congressional Quarterly article “Pentagon: The Power of Intertia”.  Apologies for not providing a link; the story is subscription only.

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Future of Arms Control: 2023 Annual Conference September 20, 2023
  • The Evolving Cyber-Based Threat: The Need for International Regulations to Avoid ‘Accidental’ Conflicts September 12, 2023
  • 전문가들 “김정은 방러, 전방위 군사 협력 현실화…중국 셈법 복잡” September 12, 2023
  • North Korea’s Kim Jong Un to meet with Vladimir Putin as Russia seeks closer military ties, more support for Ukraine war September 5, 2023
  • Biological threats have evolved for the worse, and we are not prepared September 1, 2023

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency