Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Middle East / The Not So Easy Path Forward on Disposal of Chemical Weapons

September 18, 2013

The Not So Easy Path Forward on Disposal of Chemical Weapons

Over the last few weeks, media coverage has focused on Syria and the U.S.-Russian plan to bring Syria into the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy its chemical weapons on a modified timeline.

The plan provides a historic opportunity to eliminate the Syrian chemical threat, something that was unthinkable just a few weeks ago. But implementation of the plan will not be easy.

In order to provide some context, the Center has compiled a fact sheet on the Chemical Weapons Convention; its verification body, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons; the international legal interpretations concerning chemical weapons and the history and challenges of chemical weapons disposal.

At present, the U.S. has achieved 90% destruction of its chemical weapons stockpile and is slated to complete chemical disarmament in 2023.  Russia has destroyed approximately 57% of its stockpile and is expected to complete disarmament in 2018.  Both countries have received extensions to the Convention’s 10 year deadline and missed those extended deadlines.

An international effort to eliminate Syria’s estimated 1,000 ton chemical weapons arsenal is unprecedented, though some clues as to how it might proceed can be found in the experience of the United Nations Special Commission created to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction following the Gulf War.  The program had significant success with chemical weapons but only because it was given total access and had international backing that the threat and use of use military and economic force to ensure Saddam’s compliance.

To make matters worse, Syria is still undergoing a massive civil war meaning that inspectors’ jobs will be doubly difficult.

Read the fact sheet or download a PDF copy here.

Posted in: Middle East, Nukes of Hazard blog

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Iran Is Backing Out of the Nuclear Deal That U.S. Had Already Reneged On for Years June 10, 2022
  • Biden’s mounting nuclear threats from North Korea, Iran June 10, 2022
  • ‘Predictable’ and ‘reinforces’ need for JCPOA: Statement on Iran censure, further limitations June 9, 2022
  • Time to Reset the Narrative on Missile Proliferation? June 3, 2022
  • A World Without Arms Control?  June 1, 2022
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2022 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency