Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Issue Center / Time to Name a Coordinator for WMD Proliferation

July 3, 2008

Time to Name a Coordinator for WMD Proliferation

by Kingston Reif

Published on Nukes of Hazard blog on June 26, 2008

On June 22, the Boston Globe reported that the White House has no intention of filling anytime soon the position of U.S. Coordinator for the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism.

Congress established the position within the Executive Office of the President by way of H.R. 1, commonly known as the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007. According to the law, which passed both the House and the Senate by wide margins and was signed into law by the President on August 3, 2007, the Coordinator would serve as the “principal adviser to the president on all matters relating to the prevention of weapons of mass destruction proliferation and terrorism.”

The Bush administration argues that a nuclear terrorism czar is “unnecessary given extensive coordination and synchronization mechanisms that now exist within the executive branch.”

In reality, the executive branch is in dire need of a senior official, with direct access to the President, who can formulate comprehensive and well-coordinated U.S. policies for preventing WMD proliferation and terrorism. This official would have the authority to lead interagency coordination and implementation of such policies.

Under the Bush administration’s watch, the ability of the U.S. national security bureaucracy to effectively address important arms control and nonproliferation issues has significantly deteriorated. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s July 2005 reorganization plan, which eliminated the nonproliferation and arms control bureaus and combined them into a new Bureau for International Security and Nonproliferation (ISN), has effectively:

  • weakened the State Department’s ability to achieve priority nonproliferation objectives;
  • resulted in an exodus of key staff members, leaving the new nonproliferation bureau starving for experience and expertise in arms control and nonproliferation policy and multilateral diplomacy; and
  • made it more difficult for the next administration to pursue a renewed arms control agenda.

In a welcome and much-needed shift from the policies of the Bush administration, both presumptive nominees for President have stated that they intend to strengthen the global nonproliferation regime and pursue further legally binding and verifiable reductions in the number of U.S. and Russian nuclear weapons. In order to achieve much-needed progress on effective nuclear arms control and non-proliferation, the next President will need to construct a bureaucratic structure that enhances, rather than undermines, the capacity of the United States to pursue bold measures. Filling the position of U.S. Coordinator for the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism would be a great place to start.

Posted in: Issue Center, Non-Proliferation

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Iran Is Backing Out of the Nuclear Deal That U.S. Had Already Reneged On for Years June 10, 2022
  • Biden’s mounting nuclear threats from North Korea, Iran June 10, 2022
  • ‘Predictable’ and ‘reinforces’ need for JCPOA: Statement on Iran censure, further limitations June 9, 2022
  • Time to Reset the Narrative on Missile Proliferation? June 3, 2022
  • A World Without Arms Control?  June 1, 2022
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2022 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency