• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Nuclear Weapons / Factsheets & Analysis on Nuclear Weapons / Fact Sheet: The United States Nuclear Arsenal Costs and Constraints

October 17, 2016

Fact Sheet: The United States Nuclear Arsenal Costs and Constraints

What are we building?

The United States is planning to spend up to $1 trillion to maintain and overhaul its nuclear arsenal by rebuilding each leg of the nuclear triad and aspects of its accompanying infrastructure. The plans include, but are not limited to, a new nuclear cruise missile, a modified gravity bomb, a new long range strike bomber, a new set of ballistic missile submarines, a revitalized set of ground-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, and accompanying warheads for each delivery system.

Costs

Plans to maintain and update the United States nuclear arsenal are expected to cost the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) $9.2 billion in 2017 alone. This money is specifically geared for weapons activities, including modifications and life extension programs for nuclear warheads. The Pentagon also requested more than $3 billion to strengthen the triad’s delivery systems, including warplanes and submarines.

Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work has asserted that it will cost about $18 billion a year between 2021 and 2035 to maintain and modernize the nuclear arsenal. Based on standard Pentagon estimates, these numbers do not account for cost overruns and are likely too low. Many analysts expect the full price of nuclear modernization and maintenance to near $700 billion by 2039 and total up to $1 trillion over 30 years.

Leg of the Triad Weapon Plan Estimated Request FY17 Request Overall Cost Estimate

Air

Long Range Standoff Weapon (Cruise Missile)  

New

1,000-1,100 $95.6 million $20-30 billion
B-21 (Long Range Strike Bomber) New 80-100 $1.35 billion $60-80 billion
B61-12 (Gravity Bomb) Modification 400-500 $137.9 million $7-10 billion
W80-4 (Warhead) Life Extension N/A $220.3 million $7-10 billion

Sea

SSBN-X (Nuclear Submarine) New 12 $1.86 billion $139 billion
Trident II (Missile) Modification N/A $1.22 billion $6 billion
W88 (Warhead) Life Extension N/A $281.3 million $3-4 billion
W76-1 (Warhead) Life Extension N/A $222.9 million $3-4 billion
Land+ Sea Interoperable Warheads (IW 1-3) Modification N/A N/A

$45-67 billion

 

Ground

 

Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD)  

New

642

(400 deployed)

$113.9 million $62-85 billion

*Selected major portions of nuclear weapons modernization

Budget Constraints:

Pentagon acquisitions chief Frank Kendall has cited a “huge affordability problem” across all three legs of the nuclear triad. According to the National Defense Panel’s Quadrennial Defense Review, concurrent improvements may come at the cost of conventional forces.

Meanwhile, Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Brian McKeon, has stated, “We’re looking at that big bow wave and wondering how the heck we’re going to pay for it, and probably thanking our stars we won’t be here to have to answer the question.”

Sources: National Defense Panel, National Nuclear Security Administration, Center for Non-Proliferation Studies, Defense News, United States Navy, United States Air Force

Posted in: Factsheets & Analysis on Nuclear Weapons, Factsheets & Analysis on Nuclear Weapons Spending, United States

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Long Shadow of Syria’s Chemical Weapons May 15, 2025
  • Fact Sheet: Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT) May 15, 2025
  • How real is the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan? May 13, 2025
  • Deterrence can create space for diplomacy, not replace it.  May 12, 2025
  • Op-ed: How the India-Pakistan Crisis Puts U.S. Strategy to the Test May 7, 2025

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency