• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Countries
    • Defense Spending
    • No First Use
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Nuclear Testing
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Missile Defense
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Front and Center / What Do The Non-Nuclear Weapons States Want?

May 28, 2010

What Do The Non-Nuclear Weapons States Want?

According to Iran, whose representative to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Review Conference spoke with press this afternoon while on his way to a plenary session at which the latest draft of the final document was distributed, there are three things holding up consensus on this NPT RevCon.  In particular, he said “there are three issues that have been serious obstacles for the success of the conference so far, and the [nuclear] weapons states have not cooperated:

“One is the Non-Aligned Movement – 116 countries – have demanded setting a definite timeline of 2025 to eliminate all nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapon states have not accepted that.

“Second point is there should be negative security assurances. This means that nuclear weapon states should give us a legally binding, unconditional assurance that they will not use nuclear weapons against other countries which do not have nuclear weapons. They have not accepted yet.

“The third point is to promptly commence negotiations for a Nuclear Weapons Convention.  We have non-proliferation convention, what about nuclear weapons convention. Again they have not accepted this yet.”

He went on to say that nuclear weapon states and the Non-Aligned Movement states  “have been facing a stalemate situation up until now” because of these issues.

Posted in: Front and Center, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Nukes of Hazard blog, Treaties

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • How ‘The Brink of War’ Calls Us to Action August 13, 2026
  • Reflections On My Summer Internship: Lyle Seeligson August 6, 2026
  • After Turning the War Around on Its Own, Ukraine Needs Support July 29, 2026
  • The United States has a responsibility to uphold non-proliferation norms. Here’s how it can. July 29, 2026
  • US-Saudi nuclear deal could increase proliferation risk: arms control expert | ABC NEWS July 23, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Countries
  • Defense Spending
  • No First Use
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Nuclear Testing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Missile Defense

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency