Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / World Politics Review Story on Tough Choices for Pentagon Spending Quotes Kingston Reif

March 5, 2014

World Politics Review Story on Tough Choices for Pentagon Spending Quotes Kingston Reif

As Pentagon Emphasizes Tough Choices, Post-War Budget May Force Innovation

Eric Auner
March 5, 2014

After more than a decade with the U.S. at war, the question around Washington is not whether the Defense Department’s budget will come down, but by how much. The Department of Defense officially released its base budget yesterday, which came in at slightly less than $500 billion, alongside a new Quadrennial Defense Review. Previewing the budget last week, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the new budget is the first “to fully reflect the transition DOD is making for after 13 years of war—the longest conflict in our nation’s history.”

The White House and the Pentagon face a tough balancing act, both in Washington and abroad. Some conservatives are lambasting the Obama administration for cutting the Army to what would be its smallest size since before World War II, and point especially to Russia’s recent moves in Crimea as evidence of a continued need for U.S. military might.

But according to Todd Harrison of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, the budget is “incomplete” because the amount of money that will be requested for overseas contingency operations (OCO) has not yet been announced. OCO funding has been approximately $80 billion in recent years.

As Harrison explained in a conference call with reporters on Monday, both the military services and Congress have used OCO funding—which is not subject to the spending caps known as sequestration put in place by the 2011 Budget Control Act—to pay for some of the military’s basic activities, like personnel and base maintenance. Once U.S. troops are out of Afghanistan, which may happen soon, OCO spending may become untenable, leaving the Pentagon with a hole in its budget.

Read the full article here.

Posted in: Center in the News, Press Room

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Next Up – It’s Your Turn  March 27, 2023
  • Germany walks fine line on nuclear weapons March 24, 2023
  • Russia-Ukraine War Threatens to Trigger New Nuclear Arms Race March 22, 2023
  • A Major Clue to COVID’s Origins Is Just Out of Reach March 21, 2023
  • Growing number of high-security pathogen labs around world raises concerns March 17, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency