Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Nuclear Weapons / Back to Reality: A Nuclear Arsenal to Reflect 21st Century Threats

October 2, 2012

Back to Reality: A Nuclear Arsenal to Reflect 21st Century Threats

Update (Wednesday, 10/3): Yesterday, the Project of Government Oversight (POGO) released a response to the two Post articles analyzing their authenticity and focus. The posting also includes a rebuttal from Dana Priest, author of the two Post articles, regarding the statements made by POGO. You can check it out here.

There has been much debate lately concerning what amount of defense spending is necessary for national security. But what’s to be said when appropriate methods for defense become misunderstood and perpetuate spending that drains tax payer’s dollars on outdated weapons?

Recently, journalist Dana Priest of the Washington Post released two feature articles examining the topic of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, specifically the growing costs and key decision points associated with sustaining and renewing our weapons.  In addition to containing numerous factual errors, the articles give short shrift to the bigger picture about the appropriate role and mission of nuclear weapons in the 21st century.

Two decades after the Cold War, the security threats of the 21st century have changed dramatically. As a deterrent, the estimated U.S. arsenal of approximately 5,000 warheads is superfluous. Only two nuclear weapons have been used in our history (on Nagasaki and Hiroshima at the end of World War II) and that was over six decades ago. No longer do we exist in a world where it is necessary to maintain such a large armory of nuclear weapons

As noted recently by Ajay Patel and Ben Wachendorf, a retired U.S. Navy rear admiral, “Russia can hold our land-based forces at risk, but it can’t threaten our SSBNs [ballistic-missile submarines] at sea. China is investing heavily in missile and space programs, but it is only a regional military power. The possibility that rogue states and terrorist groups could attack using nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction has increased, but if those elements are deterred by U.S. nuclear-weapon capability, the size of the U.S. nuclear arsenal is not a significant factor in that deterrence.”

Or as former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright put it to Priest: “What we have is way more than what we need.” Priest’s discussion of this fundamentally important question was buried at the end of her story.

A recent study by the Stimson Center indicates that billions of dollars would be required to update and maintain the aging nuclear arsenal amidst the looming $1.2 trillion automatic budget spending cuts that could occur this January.

Emphasis should not be placed on how to afford the extravagant costs of maintaining an excessively large nuclear arsenal, but on how to reshape our military for 21st century realities. This could help to alleviate the pressure of defense cuts by eliminating redundant and unnecessary spending on nuclear weapons.

Posted in: Nuclear Weapons, Nukes of Hazard blog

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Growing number of high-security pathogen labs around world raises concerns March 17, 2023
  • Global Biosafety Fears Grow Amid Rise in Labs Handling Dangerous Pathogens March 17, 2023
  • Evolving Threats, Un-evolving Solutions: Geo-Politicization of Export Control Policy March 17, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: The Australia Group March 16, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones March 14, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency