Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Iran Diplomacy / Factsheets on Iran Diplomacy / If Congress Says No: The Consequences of a Rejected Agreement with Iran

July 27, 2015

If Congress Says No: The Consequences of a Rejected Agreement with Iran

If Congress rejects the deal:

  • Iran will be back on the path to being a nuclear state with no restrictions on its nuclear infrastructure. Iran’s breakout time could very quickly shrink to zero.
  • The U.S. will be blamed for the breakdown of negotiations, and other countries will abandon the sanctions regime.
  • Neither Iran nor the other P5+1 nations will return to the negotiating table if the U.S. rejects an agreement supported by its negotiating partners and the entire UN Security Council.
  • The inspections regime established under the interim agreement would disappear—and Iran’s nuclear program would be unverifiable.
  • Iranian cooperation against ISIL in the Middle East could be jeopardized.
  • The hardliners in Iran will be strengthened against the more moderate President Hassan Rouhani; the hardliners are more likely to win the next election.
  • There will be extensive damage to the United States’ global reputation, threatening U.S. capacity to sustain multilateral agreements such as sanctions against Russia for its actions in Ukraine.
  • U.S. failure to uphold its word could increase anti-American extremism and the terrorist threat to the United States.
  • Calls from the U.S. military and Congress to launch military strikes against Iran would grow stronger, putting America on the path to another intractable war in the Middle East, as the choice will be Iran with a bomb or bombing Iran.

If the U.S. were to attack Iran with military force:

  • An air campaign would at best set back Iran’s program for two to four years and would require repeated, costly bombing campaigns to disrupt Iran’s efforts.
  • Iran would likely pursue a nuclear weapon covertly, relying on its scientific and engineering knowledge, which can’t be destroyed through the use of force.
  • The U.S. would shoulder most if not all of the cost and risk, given that the U.S. would almost certainly be acting without NATO or Security Council approval.
  • There could be direct Iranian retaliation against the U.S., Iranian missile or air attacks on Israel, or indirect retaliation by Hezbollah or covert, terrorist retaliation worldwide.
  • There is likely to be increased global political and economic instability, including disruptions in energy supply and security.
  • The attacks would be like pouring gasoline on the raging fires in the Middle East where many others would likely seek to advance their interests including, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Russia and China.
  • The Strait of Hormuz could be closed and could disrupt the oil market.

 

Posted in: Factsheets on Iran Diplomacy, Factsheets on Middle East, Middle East

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Next Up – It’s Your Turn  March 27, 2023
  • Germany walks fine line on nuclear weapons March 24, 2023
  • Russia-Ukraine War Threatens to Trigger New Nuclear Arms Race March 22, 2023
  • A Major Clue to COVID’s Origins Is Just Out of Reach March 21, 2023
  • Growing number of high-security pathogen labs around world raises concerns March 17, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency