• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / Knoxville News Sentinel OpEd: Upgrading B61 nuclear bomb doesn’t make sense

June 22, 2013

Knoxville News Sentinel OpEd: Upgrading B61 nuclear bomb doesn’t make sense

Upgrading B61 nuclear bomb doesn’t make sense

By Jacob Bennett & Usha Sahay on June 22, 2013

In a recent interview, Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander expressed his frustration with the out-of-control costs of nuclear weapons facilities. Asked about the increasingly expensive Oak Ridge Uranium Processing Facility, the senator told the News Sentinel’s Frank Munger: “I’ve pretty well had it with these big Energy Department projects that start out costing a billion dollars and end up costing $6 billion. We can’t afford that.”

Alexander is right to criticize the spiraling costs of the UPF. The plant is just one of a number of expensive nuclear projects that the Energy Department, in particular its National Nuclear Security Administration, has proven incapable of managing. Another example is the wasteful plan to upgrade the B61 nuclear bomb. Although the military no longer needs this Cold War weapon, the NNSA wants to modernize the B61 at the unacceptable cost of $10 billion to taxpayers.

As the highest-ranking Republican on the Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, Alexander should force the NNSA to explain why it wants billions of dollars for an outdated weapon. B61s are kept in Europe on the American taxpayers’ dime, while contributing little to U.S. security.

At the height of the Cold War, hundreds of B61 bombs were deployed to Europe to prevent a Soviet invasion of Western Europe. Today, approximately 180 of the weapons remain, ready to fend off an attack that will never come. The B61 is little more than a symbolic reminder of a 1950s commitment.

To read the full column, click here

Posted in: Center in the News, Press Room

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • How Open-Source Intelligence Can Unlock Nuclear Secrets September 27, 2023
  • The Future of Arms Control: 2023 Annual Conference September 20, 2023
  • The Evolving Cyber-Based Threat: The Need for International Regulations to Avoid ‘Accidental’ Conflicts September 12, 2023
  • 전문가들 “김정은 방러, 전방위 군사 협력 현실화…중국 셈법 복잡” September 12, 2023
  • North Korea’s Kim Jong Un to meet with Vladimir Putin as Russia seeks closer military ties, more support for Ukraine war September 5, 2023

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency