Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / Laicie Heeley Writes Letter to the Editor in The Wall Street Journal on Iran

March 27, 2015

Laicie Heeley Writes Letter to the Editor in The Wall Street Journal on Iran

Sen. Corker’s Iran Bill Is Misguided

Congress would have to vote if sanctions it voted to impose are to be permanently eliminated. The Corker bill wouldn’t change that fact.

March 25, 2015

In “Congress Deserves a Vote on Iran” (March 18), former Sen. Joseph Lieberman points out, with merit, that Congress should have the chance to weigh in once that deal is struck. Congress should and will, but Mr. Lieberman’s terms are unrelated to this fact.

In asserting that “Congress built the sanctions against Iran, it is unreasonable to bar it from any review or oversight in how that architecture is disassembled,” Mr. Lieberman misstates the Corker bill’s impact on Congress’s role in lifting sanctions. Congress would have to vote if sanctions it voted to impose are to be permanently eliminated. The Corker bill wouldn’t change that fact nor would it require Congress to vote to lift those sanctions at a given time. Corker bill or no, Congress can vote anytime to terminate the sanctions it put in place without weighing in on the terms of a final deal, and certainly without weighing in before those terms have even been struck.

Far from allowing Congress to carry out its already available authority to lift sanctions, Sen. Bob Corker’s bill would put in place additional restrictions that would move the goal posts beyond the scope of current negotiations, delay the implementation of a final deal and encourage a rushed, impractical timeline for congressional review.

Further, in making the case for Sen. Corker’s legislation, Mr. Lieberman fails to note a long history of executive agreements on foreign policy. This omission misrepresents both Sen. Corker’s legislation and any final nuclear agreement that might be achieved. Congress does have a role in this process; it’s just not the one that Messrs. Corker and Lieberman want.

Laicie Heeley

Posted in: Center in the News, Iran Diplomacy, Press & In the News on Iran Diplomacy, Press Room

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Growing number of high-security pathogen labs around world raises concerns March 17, 2023
  • Global Biosafety Fears Grow Amid Rise in Labs Handling Dangerous Pathogens March 17, 2023
  • Evolving Threats, Un-evolving Solutions: Geo-Politicization of Export Control Policy March 17, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: The Australia Group March 16, 2023
  • Fact Sheet: Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones March 14, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency