• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • 25 Years Since September 11
    • Fact Sheets
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Countries
    • Defense Spending
    • No First Use
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Nuclear Testing
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Missile Defense
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Center in the News / LANL remains key part of U.S. nuclear weapons plan

October 28, 2022

LANL remains key part of U.S. nuclear weapons plan

Policy Analyst Monica Montgomery spoke with the Santa Fe New Mexican about what the new Biden Nuclear Posture Review means for plutonium pit production and the future of a nuclear complex site in New Mexico.

“Biden administration officials have recognized the infeasibility of reaching 80 pits per year by 2030 and have not yet set a new timeline, at least not publicly,” Monica Montgomery, policy analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, wrote in an email. “If this omission was intentional in that regard, it is a positive sign of [the National Nuclear Security Administration] accepting the reality and its limitations.”

Montgomery cautioned against viewing the omission as a major shift in the agency’s plans for manufacturing pits.

The nuclear review still gives a high priority to pit production and endorses the two-site strategy, indicating the White House’s belief that it should be ramped up on a large scale, Montgomery wrote, calling that position debatable.

“We don’t need to expand plutonium pit production to maintain the safety or reliability of our existing nuclear stockpile,” she wrote. “Increasing pit production can feed an arms race at a volatile time. Until it’s proven that our current pits are unsuitable, the United States should delay expansion plans.” Read more

Posted in: Center in the News, Press & In the News on Nuclear Weapons, Press Room, United States

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 25 Years Later: Reflecting on the Human and Financial Costs of September 11 September 11, 2026
  • 25 Years Since September 11: Staff Stories: Rep. John Tierney, 49, Washington, D.C. September 10, 2026
  • 25 Years Since September 11: Staff Stories: Emma Sandifer, 3, Atlanta, Georgia September 10, 2026
  • 25 Years Since September 11: Staff Stories: Connor Murray, 7, Vienna, Austria September 10, 2026
  • 25 Years Since September 11: Staff Stories: Cameron Lopez, 11, Reston, Virginia September 10, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • 25 Years Since September 11
  • Fact Sheets
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Countries
  • Defense Spending
  • No First Use
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Nuclear Testing
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Missile Defense

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency