• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Archives for Nukes of Hazard blog

September 21, 2011

Produce to Reduce: The Hedge Gamble

In case you missed part 4 of the UCS/FAS analysis of the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Stockpile Stewardship Program for fiscal year 2012, we looked at the relationship between planned nuclear weapons complex and stockpile modernization and stockpile reductions.

We find that “the use of new warhead production facilities to produce additional hedge warheads undermines the administration’s message that the new facilities are needed to allow a reduction of the stockpile. It suggests that even with a new “responsive” warhead production complex, the future stockpile will still include a sizeable hedge of reserve warheads.”

You can read the entire post on the FAS blog or on the UCS blog.

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

September 19, 2011

UN and IAEA on Nuclear Issues

There are two major international gatherings this week. While we’re expecting Middle East issues to grab the spotlight, there are other critical nuclear issues that could and should be addressed. The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation has po…

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

September 19, 2011

UCS/FAS Analysis Part 3: Hydrodynamic Testing

Part three of the UCS/FAS analysis of the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Stockpile Stewardship Program for fiscal year 2012, titled “Hydrodynamic Tests: Not to Scale,” sheds light on scaled experiments, which are a relatively unknown form of subcritical nuclear testing.  

We find that “the push for scaled experiments is coming from NNSA officials, not the nuclear weapons laboratories. The labs have resisted because they are overburdened by the increasingly ambitious Life Extension Programs. NNSA officials claim that scaled experiments could yield ten times more data points and save money because one large scaled experiment could replace twenty of the smaller hydrodynamic experiments conducted today. Lab scientists maintain that scaled experiments would require major new equipment investments that are not currently planned.”

As you might recall, the Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee recently addressed the issue of scaled experiments in its committee report. You can read my summary of its findings here.

You can read all of post #3 on the FAS blog or on the UCS blog.

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

September 19, 2011

Livable World Board Member Matthew Hoh on Afghanistan

Video courtesy of the City Club of Cleveland, which is the oldest independent continuous free speech forum in the country, and is renowned for its tradition of debate and discussion. http://www.cityclub.org/ Matthew Hoh is a board member of Livable …

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

September 15, 2011

"Two treaties. One Congress. No time to wait."

The Center for Nonproliferation Studies’ Miles Pomper and yours truly took to the pages of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists today to urge Congress to promptly introduce and approve the implementing legislation for the 2005 Amendment to the Convent…

Posted in: Front and Center, Nukes of Hazard blog

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 179
  • Page 180
  • Page 181
  • Page 182
  • Page 183
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 281
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Will the Iran war set off a new nuclear arms race? “No one speaks of taking out Kim Jong Un” March 25, 2026
  • Front and Center: March 22, 2026 March 22, 2026
  • Why Did the United States Lift Sanctions on Assad’s Chemical Weapons Scientists? March 20, 2026
  • Iran’s Stockpile of Highly Enriched Uranium: Worth Bargaining For? March 16, 2026
  • Trump’s Claim About the Obama Nuclear Deal and Iran’s Nuclear Development March 12, 2026

Footer

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency