Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

  • Policy Issues
    • Fact Sheets
    • Countries
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Non-Proliferation
    • Nuclear Security
    • Biological & Chemical Weapons
    • Defense Spending
    • Missile Defense
    • No First Use
  • Nukes of Hazard
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Next Up In Arms Control
    • Videos
  • Join Us
  • Press
  • About
    • Staff
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Nuclear Weapons / Opportunity Knocks on Stockpile Reductions

August 15, 2012

Opportunity Knocks on Stockpile Reductions

In case you missed it, another voice joined the growing chorus of respected military leaders to suggest that cuts to the U.S. nuclear stockpile may be in the national interest: General Norton A. Schwartz, chief of staff of the Air Force.

According to the Boston Globe, General  Schwartz said in an interview:  “We have more backup systems in terms of weapons systems than we actually have deployed […] Some of that is a reasonable hedge [but] there is probably room for reductions.’’ These backup systems consist of approximately 2,800 warheads that the United States keeps in reserve, but are not ready to launch (see the outstanding Nuclear Matters Handbook for an in depth description).

While cutting the reserve is a relatively modest suggestion, it is notable because General Schwartz is the first sitting member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to say on the record that the US has more warheads in the stockpile than it needs.

Some observers have suggested that the large reserve stockpile could be used as a bargaining chip to bring Russia to the table for negotiations on tactical nuclear weapons, a category of weapons in which it has a significant numerical advantage.

Additionally, with all the recent talk about sequestration and ballooning program costs to extend the life of US nuclear warheads, it’s hardly a surprise that the budget situation is going to require tough choices. This isn’t one. Reducing the stockpile of weapons held in reserve will free up resources spent on maintenance and security, as well as future resources that must be spent to extend the life of these weapons.  General Schwartz’ comments reinforce what we already know: 2,800 warheads as a hedge is overkill.

Posted in: Nuclear Weapons, Nukes of Hazard blog

Tweets by Nukes of Hazard

Recent Posts

  • Reflecting on the past, present, and future of women in nuclear security March 30, 2023
  • Next Up – It’s Your Turn  March 27, 2023
  • Germany walks fine line on nuclear weapons March 24, 2023
  • Russia-Ukraine War Threatens to Trigger New Nuclear Arms Race March 22, 2023
  • A Major Clue to COVID’s Origins Is Just Out of Reach March 21, 2023
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.546.0795

Issues

  • Fact Sheets
  • Countries
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Non-Proliferation
  • Nuclear Security
  • Defense Spending
  • Biological and Chemical Weapons
  • Missile Defense
  • No First Use

Countries

  • China
  • France
  • India and Pakistan
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • United Kingdom

Explore

  • Nukes of Hazard blog
  • Nukes of Hazard podcast
  • Nukes of Hazard videos
  • Front and Center
  • Fact Sheets

About

  • About
  • Meet the Staff
  • Boards & Experts
  • Press
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Council for a Livable World
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Privacy Policy

Charity Navigator GuideStar Seal of Transparency